Category: paris texas chamber of commerce

For over a decade, the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce recommended a vision vs  a brand.

We’ve known, and repeatedly put in writing, that “Paris needs a vision, a theme, and the protocols to make it a highly desired destination for a large, identified segment of the market.”

What the city, the local edc, the visitor’s and convention group, and what used to be the Lamar County Chamber of Commerce came up with is a brand that gives a new meaning to “Happy Days Are Here Again.”

Thankfully, the Paris Texas Chamber was not invited to the party where the decision to blow $85,000 of the taxpayer’s money on a “brand” bragging about how Texans in Paris reach high.

Based on arrest records, its likely smoking a peculiar weed or guzzling bottled moonshine or bonded and branded alcohol.

We would have asked if they really wanted to make Paris a desired destination for that large, identified segment of the market?

Currently, there’s already too much competition within it – as well as over consumption. In every B-movie, a crook with a gun tells those being robbed, “Reach higher.”

Now, the co-conspirators are wasting more dollars pasting this brand on all kinds of stationery, vehicles, signs, ads, etc., all paid for by mingling – on an equal basis – public and private funds or lying about it.

Sure, without a doubt, this “brand” has some sort of wobbly vision, and a theme that encourages some people to do strange things, like getting arrested for peeing in public.

Of course, it might be a little less objectionable if it didn’t make so many who participate think they can sing.

It’s not, however, the kind of vision or theme we had in mind – as standing out doesn’t always mean standing up.

When you’re lying in the gutter “reach higher” also means to try and climb the curb.

Paris may soon be known as the wrath of grapes or where the dawn comes up like thunder.

If we live up to the brand, Paris will be a place where you can start out fit as a fiddle and end up tight as a drum.

When the Paris Texas Chamber talks about a vision for Paris, it’s a way to build the kind of town where you and others (we) want to live.

The theme is a designed and designated focus on an established central objective. The vision and theme must have the imperative protocols that structure the necessary goals (steps) on how the objective will be achieved.  It must be defined and realistic, with worthwhile means to pay for achieving that objective.

Our community and economic development organization are good at promoting events that publicize and promotes the event (but not Paris: Paris is just a place where the Sphecidae or Crabronidae are having a meeting). But the vision is limited.

A mish-mash of events will not likely build the kind of community you want to live in – a town where others would want to live.

 

return to:    Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

Link:

      Public-Private Partnerships

     Investing in People‘

     The Objective

 

 

The city of Paris, an existing legal entity, would have to play an enabling role sooner or later.

 

In 2008, and again in 2011, the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce recommended that the City of Paris, (1) which owns a lot of houses on which taxes have not been paid for years, and (2) with hundreds of other substandard houses with sizable tax bills that the city will also likely end up owning, take the lead on fixing the the problem by investing in people.

The city, being an existing legal entity would have to play an enabling role sooner or later.

To this end, the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce is going to try it once more:  A city that owns housing in an Enterprise Zone can establish an urban homestead program, through which the city sells a house it owns to a private citizen for an amount not to exceed $100.

The Individual buying the property must agree to live in the house for at least seven years and to renovate or remodel the residence to meet the level of maintenance stated in a written agreement between the individual and the city.  After the individual lives in the house for the seven years and satisfies the agreed upon improvements, the city deeds the house to the individual (or assigns it to a bank that may be financing improvements for the individual). 

True, not all the folks hopping on an urban homestead program will follow thru…and the city’s program administrator will have to reclaim the property.  But many will follow thru, improving their lives (and the City of Paris). 

Any homes that are returned can be offered to others who will complete the terms of the homestead agreement. 

 

There will never be enough homes . . .


Last year, in 2008, the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce tried to point city officials to the fact that there are many individuals with the energy and strength of character who could and would use their sweat equity for an opportunity to own their own home under such a program. 

Yes, we understand that many local movers and shakers, who have no more idea of community and economic development than Oak Wilt fungus, see the Paris Chamber as an irritant to their schemes or beliefs; but they should know that business is business and a good idea is a good idea – no matter where it comes from. . 

Paris talks about improving Paris.  Paris talks about the need to improve and beautify. Paris talks about substandard homes with unpaid taxes, and talks about what to do with them. But not utilizing available programs to improve a large part of Paris because it is on the west or – as many of the more ignorant state it – the wrong side of town is inexcusable!

Absolutely, we understand why some want to deny incentives for businesses and new home construction in the Enterprise Zone, even if such action violates warranties that had to be made in the Contract to get the Zone approved. We find such actions wrong, ethically repulsive, and don’t agree with it, but, considering all the parties involved, we understand it.

But to deny younger couples or retirees and others who have the energy and/or resources to own their homes – while eliminating eyesores – and improving Paris – is mind-boggling!  And that we don’t understand . . .

Investing in people is actually community development, so why wouldn’t we invest in ways to help people?

Talk about creating opportunities – 

 

The Paris Chamber’s recommendations are on record, so they cannot plead ignorance.  And its a program that can actually pay for itself.

Since 2008, the money the city has wasted (and is wasting) on know-little consultants would have paid for improving residential areas all over Paris, through which clean-up, fix-up, paint-up materials would be exchanged for “sweat equity” labor and . . .

Oh, well —
How much longer can Paris afford to wait? 

 

                                                               return to  The Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

 

Links:

       These Little Town Blues . . .

     A Public Information (BS) Officer

 

 

 

A BABY BORN IN PARIS TEXAS  

. . . . IS GOING TO FIND THINGS DIFFICULT.  BEING SLAPPED ON THE BUTT IS A DISGRACE, BUT (NO PUN INTENDED) FINDING YOU’RE $17,931 IN DEBT TO THE CITY ON YOUR FIRST BREATH ISN’T THE WAY YOU WANT TO ENTER LIFE. 

ITS ENOUGH TO MAKE ANYONE CRY.

Understanding) THE CITY OF PARIS TEXAS BUDGET

This fiscal year, 2023-2024, the City of Paris claimed it only increased its budget by 3.5%. But it raised more revenue from property taxes than last year’s budget by $1,912,026 – a 20.31% increase.  

Of that amount, only $101,001 is from new property added to the tax roll in 2022-2023.

REVENUE ($53,418,850.00)

General Fund: $ 31,051,550.00

Water and Sewer Fund: $ 20,987,300.00

Sanitation and Landfill Fund: $ 1,380,000.00

CURRENT DEBT:

The total of bonds and other debt obligations (principal and interest) outstanding is $123,445,000 of which $37,091,035 will be paid by property taxes. (But fees, permits, fines, retail sales, hotel occupancy taxes, local electric, gas, internet, phone, other taxes and/or fees are also paid by property owners, as well as by renters of property in Paris, and by those visiting Paris. Either directly or indirectly, property taxes are paid by everyone, i.e.; part of a retail item’s cost pays a portion of the property taxes owed by the retail outlet’s owner.)

An assessed property with a $100,000 taxable value owes a debt of $477.82 to the city.

ANTICIPATED Budget and Debt Costs:

City’s new Wastewater Treatment plant – an estimated base cost of $128,000,000. (Not counting interest.)

Current Budget:                                             $   53,418,850.

Current debt & Obligations:                         $ 133,861,575.

WWTP Anticipated New debt (P & I):        $  259,201,276.   

        Total Budget, Current & Future Debt Costs:            $  446,481,701.00

 

          $ 446,481,701 .00 is a tidy sum, even for the Texas Lotto.       

Other items of interest:

Capital purchases (one-time purchases); vehicles, certain equipment, studies, etc., are difficult to predict. An example being the recent $125,000 wasted for a local housing study so the city can have an excuse to do what it wants to do, which will not help real housing problems.

Surplus funds: Needed for dedicated annual revenue in case another assistant city manager is needed or some other man-made disaster occurs, or a big hunk of Paris is swallowed by a giant creature flying in from a far-off galaxy. When funds are not available, re-occurring or new revenue must be found.

So a healthy reserve needs to be available … as its just money the taxpayers don’t need.


Each of Paris’ 24,900 citizens will owe $17,931 to the City of Paris, based on today’s dollars.

The promised “. . . no increases in fees . . .”

Since 2003, this is the disastrous result of what the City of Paris Texas has done regarding a needed wastewater treatment plant:

The originally estimated wastewater plant cost of $30-to-$35 million jumped to $76 million in 2017. Five years later, by 2022, the cost jumped to $100 million. Now, barely into 2024, the estimated cost has reached a staggering $128 million. (No official estimate has been released on how many gallons of wastewater per day [GPD] the plant will treat.)

What simply drives all that off the scale of common sense is that taxpayers cannot say they were not warned.

From the city’s original estimated costs, the Paris Chamber continually has stated that what Paris did (and is doing) hits a new high in stupidity.

Jiggery-pokery, however, is not unknown in politics. Consider: In 2013, facing a $47 million bond vote for water and sewer improvements, citizens were told that “no increases in water and sewer rates would be needed.”

But in 2017-18, the city added an estimated $7.60 monthly to the local sewer rates (around $100 a year MORE than we were paying) to “help pay for a new sewer treatment plant.” Then, on 4-1-2021, water and sewer rates were again increased another $7.65 a month , and “routinely increase every six months” until 4-1-2026. And again, we were told that the increases were needed to help “finance construction of a new wastewater plant.”  

No matter how some may want to spin it, that was the spirit of intent in all the statements.

So, where’s the plant? Of course, there isn’t one.

SO, IF the money generated from the increases in rates have been used for other purposes, where is accountability?  IF the income from those past rate increases isn’t in an established, ear-marked fund for a new plant, as was promised, where did the money go?

And, please, no Happy Talk of it being used to “pay down other debt.”  The “other debt” was, supposedly, being paid from the tax and utility rate increases for those purposes.

But WHY a $128 million costs?

 

A Look at independent reporting on types and costs of wastewater treatment in Texas.

The Texas Water Newsroom, produced by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), was created to tell the stories of Texas water—the people, places, issues, and efforts—on water and wastewater. So, let’s look at examples of just one funding source for wastewater infrastructure (and development of wetland and wildlife areas):

There were – are – billions of dollars available from public and private sources for proposed wetlands and wildlife areas; especially, those associated with reuse projects. Both such projects were the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce recommendations back in 2012 for a portion of the flood plains adjacent to Lake Crook.* We even threw in the fact that such projects would gain favor for grants and low-cost loans, thereby reducing the cost of a new wastewater plant.

IF Paris had acted, the cost for a treatment plant likely would have been less than $30 million, and be up and running by now . . .

The Paris leadership ignored the recommendation and, by doing so, are now presenting the taxpayers a bill of $128 million ($259,201,276 million w/interest) for not acting. Likely, too busy finding ways to dump more debt on babes born in Paris, Texas; and to give tax money away to those who don’t need it . . .

We’ve known for years that growing pressure in the U. S. to develop resilient, drought-resistant water supplies — particularly for the West — wastewater recycling for potable use was rapidly becoming more important than ever. (A recent article from Wastewater Digest explores emerging technologies for wastewater recycling, for purposes ranging from potable reuse to mineral extraction and basic agriculture.)

 

* If interested, email us (parischamber@paristexaschamberofcommerce.com) and we’ll send you a copy of the recommendation to the Paris City Council, the PEDC, and what used to be the Lamar County Chamber. Its still a viable and workable endeavor…

                                                                    return to     Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

Links:

      The Phone

      Local Government

      Residential Renewal or Stupidity