NEW OR RECENT POST

 

 

 

A BABY BORN IN PARIS TEXAS  

. . . . IS GOING TO FIND THINGS DIFFICULT.  BEING SLAPPED ON THE BUTT IS A DISGRACE, BUT (NO PUN INTENDED) FINDING YOU’RE $17,931 IN DEBT TO THE CITY ON YOUR FIRST BREATH ISN’T THE WAY YOU WANT TO ENTER LIFE. 

ITS ENOUGH TO MAKE ANYONE CRY.

Understanding) THE CITY OF PARIS TEXAS BUDGET

This fiscal year, 2023-2024, the City of Paris claimed it only increased its budget by 3.5%. But it raised more revenue from property taxes than last year’s budget by $1,912,026 – a 20.31% increase.  

Of that amount, only $101,001 is from new property added to the tax roll in 2022-2023.

REVENUE ($53,418,850.00)

General Fund: $ 31,051,550.00

Water and Sewer Fund: $ 20,987,300.00

Sanitation and Landfill Fund: $ 1,380,000.00

CURRENT DEBT:

The total of bonds and other debt obligations (principal and interest) outstanding is $123,445,000 of which $37,091,035 will be paid by property taxes. (But fees, permits, fines, retail sales, hotel occupancy taxes, local electric, gas, internet, phone, other taxes and/or fees are also paid by property owners, as well as by renters of property in Paris, and by those visiting Paris. Either directly or indirectly, property taxes are paid by everyone, i.e.; part of a retail item’s cost pays a portion of the property taxes owed by the retail outlet’s owner.)

An assessed property with a $100,000 taxable value owes a debt of $477.82 to the city.

ANTICIPATED Budget and Debt Costs:

City’s new Wastewater Treatment plant – an estimated base cost of $128,000,000. (Not counting interest.)

Current Budget:                                             $   53,418,850.

Current debt & Obligations:                         $ 133,861,575.

WWTP Anticipated New debt (P & I):        $  259,201,276.   

        Total Budget, Current & Future Debt Costs:            $  446,481,701.00

 

          $ 446,481,701 .00 is a tidy sum, even for the Texas Lotto.       

Other items of interest:

Capital purchases (one-time purchases); vehicles, certain equipment, studies, etc., are difficult to predict. An example being the recent $125,000 wasted for a local housing study so the city can have an excuse to do what it wants to do, which will not help real housing problems.

Surplus funds: Needed for dedicated annual revenue in case another assistant city manager is needed or some other man-made disaster occurs, or a big hunk of Paris is swallowed by a giant creature flying in from a far-off galaxy. When funds are not available, re-occurring or new revenue must be found.

So a healthy reserve needs to be available … as its just money the taxpayers don’t need.


Each of Paris’ 24,900 citizens will owe $17,931 to the City of Paris, based on today’s dollars.

The promised “. . . no increases in fees . . .”

Since 2003, this is the disastrous result of what the City of Paris Texas has done regarding a needed wastewater treatment plant:

The originally estimated wastewater plant cost of $30-to-$35 million jumped to $76 million in 2017. Five years later, by 2022, the cost jumped to $100 million. Now, barely into 2024, the estimated cost has reached a staggering $128 million. (No official estimate has been released on how many gallons of wastewater per day [GPD] the plant will treat.)

What simply drives all that off the scale of common sense is that taxpayers cannot say they were not warned.

From the city’s original estimated costs, the Paris Chamber continually has stated that what Paris did (and is doing) hits a new high in stupidity.

Jiggery-pokery, however, is not unknown in politics. Consider: In 2013, facing a $47 million bond vote for water and sewer improvements, citizens were told that “no increases in water and sewer rates would be needed.”

But in 2017-18, the city added an estimated $7.60 monthly to the local sewer rates (around $100 a year MORE than we were paying) to “help pay for a new sewer treatment plant.” Then, on 4-1-2021, water and sewer rates were again increased another $7.65 a month , and “routinely increase every six months” until 4-1-2026. And again, we were told that the increases were needed to help “finance construction of a new wastewater plant.”  

No matter how some may want to spin it, that was the spirit of intent in all the statements.

So, where’s the plant? Of course, there isn’t one.

SO, IF the money generated from the increases in rates have been used for other purposes, where is accountability?  IF the income from those past rate increases isn’t in an established, ear-marked fund for a new plant, as was promised, where did the money go?

And, please, no Happy Talk of it being used to “pay down other debt.”  The “other debt” was, supposedly, being paid from the tax and utility rate increases for those purposes.

But WHY a $128 million costs?

 

A Look at independent reporting on types and costs of wastewater treatment in Texas.

The Texas Water Newsroom, produced by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), was created to tell the stories of Texas water—the people, places, issues, and efforts—on water and wastewater. So, let’s look at examples of just one funding source for wastewater infrastructure (and development of wetland and wildlife areas):

There were – are – billions of dollars available from public and private sources for proposed wetlands and wildlife areas; especially, those associated with reuse projects. Both such projects were the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce recommendations back in 2012 for a portion of the flood plains adjacent to Lake Crook.* We even threw in the fact that such projects would gain favor for grants and low-cost loans, thereby reducing the cost of a new wastewater plant.

IF Paris had acted, the cost for a treatment plant likely would have been less than $30 million, and be up and running by now . . .

The Paris leadership ignored the recommendation and, by doing so, are now presenting the taxpayers a bill of $128 million ($259,201,276 million w/interest) for not acting. Likely, too busy finding ways to dump more debt on babes born in Paris, Texas; and to give tax money away to those who don’t need it . . .

We’ve known for years that growing pressure in the U. S. to develop resilient, drought-resistant water supplies — particularly for the West — wastewater recycling for potable use was rapidly becoming more important than ever. (A recent article from Wastewater Digest explores emerging technologies for wastewater recycling, for purposes ranging from potable reuse to mineral extraction and basic agriculture.)

 

* If interested, email us (parischamber@paristexaschamberofcommerce.com) and we’ll send you a copy of the recommendation to the Paris City Council, the PEDC, and what used to be the Lamar County Chamber. Its still a viable and workable endeavor…

                                                                    return to     Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

Links:

      The Phone

      Local Government

      Residential Renewal or Stupidity

private-public opportunities are not allowed taxpayers

 

When private money is taken to spent on a public-private purpose, the private-public partnership is the epitome` of socialism. An example being the planned development in Paris, Texas, by the partnership of the Dallas-based Javelin Investment Group and the Paris Housing Authority.

Council members approved an eight-acre site for a multi-story 60-unit apartment for Section 8 families and private-pay clients by the group and the housing authority. By using this as an excuse, in its desire to show “progress”, the council also approved granting commercial and residential tax abatement on the 19-acre block owned by the private investors.

Go down to City Hall and declare your intention not to pay your property taxes for seven or ten years.

Javelin is in the business to make money.

The city is forcing taxpayers to give it to them.

The Paris Texas Chamber realizes that the nation is well on its way to socialism, but what brain freeze dreamed this nonsense up?

Why will a city provide private developers opportunities it will not allow taxpayers who have paid the bills for years? Instead, over just the last two years it increased the budget over 7-percent (roughly $5 million), dumping the responsibility for it on in-city residents.

There’s nothing fair or balanced – or even intelligent – about what Paris is doing; its merely a scheme to benefit the few by stiffing the majority; and cover the resulting manure pit with Happy Talk.

 

There’s no accountability.

Socialist Eugene V. Debs made a great-sounding speech in Girard, Kansas, in 1908, which became his public platform: “When we are in partnership and have stopped clutching each other’s throats, when we have stopped enslaving each other, we will stand together, hands clasped, and be friends. We will be comrades, we will be brothers, and we will begin the march to the grandest civilization the human race has ever known.”

(Dream on, brother, dream on!!!) But someone must make decisions. Debs never could agree on who that someone should be … he ran for president five times.

In his first race, in 1900, Debs was the candidate of the Social Democratic Party, which led to the formation of the Socialist Party. As its candidate in 1920, he received almost one million votes, 6% of the total.

In 2020, with the private-public State Capitalism partnership of Big Business and Big Government in full force, slightly over 50% of American voters cast ballots to increase the role of government.

Since 1900, millions of people who, voluntarily or non-voluntarily, entered a promised “democratic socialism” partnership have been killed by their government. The dead surpassed 30-million in China; 6-million plus in Germany; an estimated 12 to 15 million in Russia. Cambodia killed killed half its citizens. Other countries have slaughter hundreds of hundred thousands. And millions of people today live in human misery and enslavement under the same generic dream – the “democratic socialism” – of Cuba, Mexico, Venezuela, and Indo-China and the Mid-East nations, and others, that seek control of resources and the means of production.

And there’s no accountability . . .

There’s not even an apology.

In recent years, both major parties have gradually endorsed many of the ideas Debs advocated. Its why the nation is absolutely divided – and $34-trillion in debt.

So what does this have to do with Paris Texas?

Suckers always believe that government can manage or guarantee happiness. But if we can’t do it for ourselves, how can those in government do it for us?

What Paris is doing reflects a wide range of misinterpretations of sound community and economic development, and a serious lack of a common knowledge of socialism’s devious and complicated evolution, and how it operates in practice across the political spectrum.

Those encouraging socialism are mentally-ill people who should never be in leadership positions.

Government favoritism – socialism – is wrong, whether in Paris or Austin Texas, or Nutland DC.

Or, any nation.