talking, not doing . . .


Paris talks about improving Paris.  Paris talks about the need to improve and beautify. Paris talks about substandard homes with unpaid taxes, and talks about what to do with them. Paris prefers talking, not doing.

Talking is a poor substitute for doing.

Behind all that Happy Talk, however, improvement is taking money – from some who can barely make economic ends meet – and giving it to others who are doing well economically, but who can help make the givers seem like they have a sound mind.

Most local builders are chased out of the city limits with inane regulations, which have created residential and business growth in most Lamar County’s smaller communities. In turn, the City of Paris uses public tax-dollars to pay for land, water and sewer services, streets, curbs and gutters, even administration, and “other development incentives” to guarantee a profit to outside firms – some who take their profit back home with them, and some who leave us holding an empty bag of promises.

Ordinances are local laws designed to hold those without brown noses to the grindstone, while allowing those with brown noses to practice “how to circumvent the law without accountability.”

Those with brown noses, for some reason, don’t like to be reminded of it.

Talking, and not doing demonstrates that Paris is at war with itself, as many weed-infested neighborhoods are breeding grounds for blight and decay –

But Paris doesn’t want to talk about that . . .

While talking, not doing, about keeping Paris beautiful, the grass and weeds keep onna’ growing. Not all weeds are flowers, but they are appreciated by all the local blooming idiots and passersby.

We use to tiptoe through the tulips. . . now we just waddle through the weeds.

                                               

Inside the city limits, there are five and six year old weeds in key places; i.e; on privately and city owned properties, along the right-of-way of state and U. S. Highways, and city streets.

Some are so old and large they are monuments to Mother Nature.

Those who believe that man can control climate should visit Paris, Texas; a city that proves weeds cannot be controlled (at least, inside the city limits). If weeds cannot be controlled, forget about the world’s climate.

As someone said, “Paris is a victory garden  —  too bad the weeds won.”

We’re lucky that so many weeds are covered with litter.

Littering, evidently, is a hobby for most folks in Paris, as, like the weeds, litter is all over town. All kinds of litter.

Drive around the Loop or around town and it’s likely the Florida firm that came up with the high-dollar logo proclaiming “Paris Texas – where Texans reach higherwas thinking that was how we stacked our litter or it was the only way to climb out of it.

While talking, not doing, we’re actually building a dump ground that 24,900 bewitched, bothered, bewildered and befuddled people call home.

Well, I’ve been all over this world

down to the Gulf of Mexico,

but I ain’t never seen a dump heap

calling itself a city before . . .

                                                                                         ( – apologies to Dr. John and his Cabbage Head song…)

The Paris Texas Chamber has urged Paris to invest in people for years. It’s actually the best – and least expensive – way to do community development: Build it and they will come.

So why will we not invest in ways to help people help Paris?

return to   Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

                                        link:

                                          Incentivizing

                                          Four Existing Facts

                                           The Objective Reality

A Public Hearing To Give-Away $20-million            

On September 9, 2024, at 5:30 pm, in the City Council Chamber, the City of Paris, Texas, held a public hearing on a $20-Million Give-Away. Entering 2025, transparency is still lacking – even with a new ‘public information officer’.

Anyway, it was on the same project on which a groundbreaking was celebrated by city planners on March 24, 2004, which, at that time, the city was prepared to offer “community development incentives” of $7-million.

Many of us have failed to realize that inflation was increasing that fast . . .

Prior to 1987, Texas cities were not allowed to give incentives to solicit businesses, industry, or other endeavors. Then the same foolish voters, who previously in 1981, approved local Appraisal Districts to establish an excuse and protective barrier for local taxing units, allowed cities to use public taxes for private purposes. (FYI side note: The state budget in 1977 was $24 billion; today, the current budget is $321.7 billion from all revenue sources.)

So now, the City is setting the stage to do a $20-million give-away to subsidize development of private property – to create the Forestbrook Public Improvement District No. 1.”

Behind all the diligently researched (supposedly) and carefully crafted words to build a blinding mountain of sizzle, it dumps a $20-million- plus debt on taxpayers, which council members will then give to or spend for the private limited liability company, Lone Star Planned Developments, LLC.

Now, the city doesn’t say it like this, of course; it relies on the sizzle to sell rotten meat. For instance, the hearing was to “accept public comments” and “discuss” the creation of a public improvement district for 200-homes, which the city already intended to approve (or there would not have been the March 2004 celebration). The hearing was simply a CYA thing.

  • As presented, this “Improvement District” has a total land area of 200-acres – roughly, a $100,000 per acre or lot cost just for improvements for each of the proposed 200 homes. But more sizzle comes from the promise of new city streets, a new park, a new elementary school, and other goodies – a smell designed to attract particular birds, a kettle when they are flying, a committee when they are resting, and a wake when they are feeding
  • Improvements include design and construction, landscaping, streets, drainage, off-street parking, water and sewer lines and services, etc., including other off-site projects that would be a benefit to the property
  • Acquisition, by purchase or otherwise, of real property
  • Payment of expenses incurred in the establishment, administration, and operation of the District
  • Payment of financing associated with financing public improvement projects
  • The city says this district “would include property owned” by the limited liability company, but has not disclosed if there is or isn’t any current indebtedness. Nor, if there is, the amount
  • The city shall levy assessment on each parcel within the District in a manner that results in imposing equal shares of the costs on property similarly benefited” (but who determines ‘equal’ and ‘similarly’ – you know, like east and west?)

There’s more, most of it Happy Double Talk: “The city is not obligated to provide any funds to finance the authorized improvements, except for assessments levied on real property within the District.”

“Except” – that’s government splitting a hair for you: Who guarantees the $20 million used for the development?

And will the promise of new city streets, a new park, and a new elementary school (for which school district?) require design, development, construction, administrative, operational, and other additional costs?

Where’s transparency? 

Council Members are, in fact, public servants. As such, they owe a fiduciary duty to the public they serve; a concept that underlie most if not all ethic laws. As fiduciary trustees they are obligated to act diligently in the best interest of the citizens.

As trustees of the citizens of Paris, city council members are elected to oversee and manage the property and debt of the citizens, as well as the day-to-day events. But as the citizen’s trustees, council members cannot sell or giveaway the property of the citizens without the citizen’s permission. The fact is – without approval by the citizens – using some questionable loophole council members have dumped or is dumping another $20-million of debt on the citizens. 

The only money that government has is that which it takes from the citizens.

Trustees can be replaced, but debt must be paid.

The $20 million goes for planning and design, land acquisition and development, the related cost, and  administration,  plus  acquisition of other properties.  So, what costs remain?

The assessments are on top of property taxes, and are calculated according to the size of the parcel, tract or lot, while property taxes are assessed on appraised value. Unlike the property tax, however, assessments made by an Improvement District expire once paid in full.

If taxes are frozen within the district, as usual in such projects, it means that schools and other taxing units cannot increase taxes on the property, including the City of Paris. It denies those units their right of taxation; plus, it’s not fair to those who have to subsidize the district when higher tax rates and city service fees increase outside the protected district.

Or, is there a worm in the woodwork somewhere . . . ? 

For instance, exactly how much equity money have the “districtpromoters invested in their own project?  10%?  15%?  20%? Nothing?  Will taxpayers outside the district’s boundaries pay for “acquisition of other property” that consists of access to the project or expanding utilities needed to serve the development?

Treating such street and service costs as normal public costs is unethical, if not illegal. Using public money for a private purpose (a direct subsidy for the developer) is not viewed favorably by most courts.

The Paris Texas Chamber hopes, regardless what some may say, that the taxpayers understand that repayment of all city-related debt (plus the interest) is guaranteed by the taxpayers, and if results do not materialize for whatever reason(s), the taxpayers are “obligated” to pay it​?

What does Paris need most? Spending $20-million on a gamble or investing in people and rebuilding neighborhoods?

We’re subsidizing a limited liability company with nothing to lose but a dream –

Since the 1980s, Paris has done a lot of dumb things but, evidently, as our new brand warns, we keep reaching higher . . .

                                       return to    Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce

Links:

AMENITIES VS ESSENTIAL

Residential Renewal or Stupidity