A fish at the end of the fisherman’s line may or may not know that it just had a bad idea. Not Paris taxpayers. When we grab a-hold of a bad idea, we think it’s wonderful. We must be the most gullible breed of taxpayer. On that point, we’re hooked on the idea that tax subsidy programs, cash economic incentives, and restrictive improvement rules and a closer incestuous relationship between the Three Mustyrears will spur community and economic growth.

We have such a mouthful of that bait, we can’t answer the simple question, “Where does government get its money?”

While we’re floundering around in the muddy water of government inspired inflation, higher taxes, and a disintegrating society, with the line getting shorter to the frying pan, we’re still believing that paying out cash in the form of grants and relinquishing revenue (thru’ tax abatement, fee waivers, and other subsidizes, such as a special tax for a special purpose – examples being the PEDC, the Visitor’s Tax, TIF Districts, a new ridiculous ‘5 for 5’ Program’ or the recently recommended PACE Program) – promotes growth in the private sector, and that higher taxes will make everything alright.

Studies show that hungry cities, like hungry fish, often do desperate and – usually – dumb things.

We forget that, at its core, every government program sold as a public purpose has a way to fleece the public.

Consider: After 2-years of government mandated mask wearing and shutdown of businesses, schools, and social gatherings, for this fiscal year the City of Paris hit taxpayers with a 3.5% tax increase; the highest allowed by law (without a vote). This, on top of a series of yearly rate increases on water and sewer bills that add millions to the budget annually.

The results? The City’s revenue budget for this fiscal year is $58.6-million, which includes an operational budget of $47.3 million (a $7.3 million increase).

We’ve done this after two decades has resulted in a loss of population inside the city limits, according to U. S. Census reports, while most of Texas has seen rapid growth.

Like most government programs the promotion is better than the product. Listen to government and everything sounds good. So does an artificial bait to a fish.

Instead of contributing or building a prosperous economy for all Paris families and promoting the creation of good jobs over the last 25-30 years, Paris has actually deepened the expenses of small businesses, created income inequalities for working families, encourage blight and decay in many neighborhoods, and increased the tax burden on every citizen. This is not good government.

But whose fault is it?

Good government can only be achieved by its citizens.

Based on the Paris Chamber’s knowledge of economic incentive programs, gained through years of community and economic development work, we believe that every citizen should be held accountable for the actions of their government. Good government is their responsibility.

It’s why we have a vote.

The development and implementation of policies that encourage private business investments in local families and neighborhoods, encourage business growth and innovation, and reward taxpayers are how communities are likely to achieve success.

For years, Affordable Housing . . . .

. . . .was the subject the City of Paris, Texas, the Paris Economic Development Corporation (PEDC), and What Used to be the Lamar County Chamber of Commerce, bragged about (the low costs of living). But what they refused to acknowledge was that “the low costs’ came in housing – substandard and historically-obsolete housing, which the Paris Texas Chamber repeatedly warned was not an asset.

Now, it’s a hot topic by people who don’t have a worthwhile idea of what to do about it any more than a week-long drunk Bessiebug.

Less than half the homes in Paris are owner occupied. 3,000 Properties are on tax-delinquent lists. The city is holding title to over 600 properties, and can’t maintain them. It could have three times as many, but doesn’t know what to do with the ones they already own. Adding to the problem, too many landlords have been and are excused from any attempts to maintain their properties. Or in some instances, prevented from making improvements (the FNB Building comes to mind).

Now, insanity is raging through the local taxing units: The local leadership has approved a “5 by 5 Program” (offering incentives to build five or seven $200,000 affordable homes of 1250 to 1350 square feet, which does not include lot cost, as the taxing units are giving title to the citizen’s public property for one dollar).

How can we know the right thing to do, if we can’t honestly face the fact that “affordable housing” is feel good politically-correct crap to make low-income housing sound better.

But it is what it is ––

Who, in their right mind, would think that subsidizing a $200,000 home is affordable housing for those with low incomes?

 

IF there is accountability for the failure that surely is coming?

Some are advocating for affordable apartments – “places that average workers can afford and be safe and comfortable in . . .” Trouble is, apartments may help a developer’s cash flow, but it doesn’t do much to help low income workers improve their lives economically.

We hate the term, the condescending attitude conveyed in the insult, of average worker. The average worker holds society together, keeps it running, delivering goods and services. If they never get to Heaven, it’s not because they ain’t tried . . .

Its government that keeps messing things up, trying to prove it’s worth: In 1975, the maximum FHA would finance a single-family home was around $71,000. This year, 2022, the loan limit is $970,800. That’s responsible government?

The U. S. national debt was $5.6 trillion in September 2000. Beginning this fiscal year (September 2023), debt had increased to $32-trillion. It’s government doing what government does best. Now, the debt is over $36 trillion, thanks to our elected leaders in Nutland, D. C.   Is that, also, responsible government?

And no matter how much government lies, mentally-deficient voters think it is responsible and that we need more of it?

Mercy !

Does Paris need bare-bone quarters built for “average workers” or a way to convert the bulk of substandard properties inside the city limits to improved single-family homes?

Do we want to subsidize an apartment builder or help low income families improve their lives? Sure. The Paris Chamber recognizes the need for a wide range of available rental properties, as some of us – for a variety of reason – don’t want the responsibility of home ownership. But we also know that building equity in home ownership is a way of creating assets.

You cannot improve your life without ownership of private property, the rights to which are guaranteed in our nation’s Constitution.

Ownership of private property is how you climb out of poverty.

Subsidizing some builder only gets you another day older and deeper in debt ––

 

                           return to  Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce