NEW OR RECENT POST

Since 2008, the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce has repeatedly stated that our local community and economic development organizations need restructuring.

After 14-years, they still do. Every time we say it, the local organizational bureaucracy react as if we had called their mothers a bad name (or told the truth about them).

The first objective of our local community and economic development organizations seem to be protection of the status quo at all cost, regardless of how much it costs Paris.

So, allow us to re-frame the problem this way: Would bad organizational structure subtract from how citizen’s value their community?

Each of us can all think of ways in which it might do so: For example, when you encountered employees who face the public but are not empowered to make key decisions; where Artificial Intelligence (AI) robots have replaced live agents and you really want to talk to some high-management idiot; or when, signing up with a provider of Internet service, such as Suddenlink / Altice / Optimum (a franchisee of a City that protects the monopoly against any equal opportunities for access), you are, as with taxes, subjected to forced compliance: To give your money and every right you have under the Bill of Rights in exchange for Internet service, which is a “must have” in today’s digital age.

Forced compliance, it should be argued, is a violation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

In those cases, restructuring by those organizations could generate improved customer experiences, enhance customer’s value, and enrich community value.

Years ago, the Paris Chamber realized that knowledge and knowledge flow must replace formal management structures and face-to-face administration. (As there is a world of difference between formal and informal management.)

Make no mistake, we’re not saying that daily production, a conventional planning-and-control approach, should be thrown out with the bath water. We are saying that greater freedom, flexibility, and an open attitude toward restructuring should focus on the individuals within the community; that removing boundaries and a constant exchange of transparent data and information with the community are ways of liberating their power – providing them a setting in which they can express their creativity.

These are a necessity for community and economic improvement.

After making sure headquarters are running smoothly, and cooperatively, the first goal is to try every initiative, while assuming that it could be a new opportunity.

Do not follow. Take the lead, change the standard, practice creative destruction (open dissent, when needed), and constantly try to understand how to increase value for the community – not the organization.

Promoters are bundling these common sense steps as “development of a process of innovation” – including, of course, calculation of how much they can charge!

It’s all terminology: Branding and Innovation; terms to relieve taxpayers of their money.

But all endeavors, except for government, live or die based on whether the market – the customers – pays for value perceived, or not.

Increase community value by more wealth generation opportunities, and this will reward the organization by its increased value to the community.

The advice is free.

The knowledge on how to do is is not.

The Great Art of selling baloney

BY Law, it’s the local Stooges – uh – property tax payers of Paris – who are responsible for all debts of the PEDC. They are the ones who are subsidizing industry in Lamar County, in addition to Paris. Families who can barely afford to feed their kids and pay the cost of city utilities are subsidizing some of the most profitable industries.

Consider that the Paris Economic Development Corporation (the PEDC) gave $350,000 to Blossom Aerospace, a firm in Blossom, Texas, which was recently purchase by an Oklahoma firm.

The PEDC’s President was reported that the gift “aligns with the PEDC’s priorities of business retention and expansion.”

The PEDC’s Executive Director was also quoted, saying that it “was a win for our community that will generate over $70 million in new payroll over the next seven years.”

The money being given away comes from the Paris retail sales tax, of course, not Blossom’s.

And the ability to tell the future – to the dollar – should earn one a multi-billion annual salary or, at least, an appointment as Secretary of the U. S. Department of the Treasury.

Even demented Joe could understand that kind of clarity.

It’s Great Art or a Sharpie drawing.

Every time you clean something, you just make something else dirty.

Regardless, its enough to make you wanta’ slap your Grandma . . .

Yes, we’re told that the local economy does not stop at the Paris city limits, as many of the employees, working in Paris, live in Lamar County and spend money in Paris.

So do some happy folks in Oklahoma, and in Red River, Delta and Fannin Counties.

Using that logic, will Paris subsidize industries in those areas, too?

Are Petty, Direct, Detroit, Roxton, Reno, and all the other Lamar County communities eligible?

For years, we’ve been told a lot of things. Most of it being Happy Talk and Half Truths; all tied together with a logic that defies understanding.

How much of this twisting in the wind help those who cannot afford to pay for salaries, retirement, office expenses, street repairs and water and sewer and property taxes inside the city limits?

Sadly, proponents of corporate welfare suffer from a false belief that they can best determine what technology has the best chance of success, which jobs and products best supply our needs, where best to expend scarce supplies of capital, and that the rest of us will believe just about everything.

For a lot of people, this kind of stuff ruins doing much for Paris.

And the excuse of “They’re creating jobs” ignores the fact that companies need someone in those jobs – people working to create or produce a product that can be sold for a profit. Without bodies, without someone in those jobs, there is no profit.

But the PEDC is swapping cash and other incentives for promises.

Some economically desperate towns will give anything that’s not nailed down to a new industry.

Not only will Paris do it, we’ll throw in some cash as well.

 

One of the reasons why the Paris Texas Chamber of Commerce distrusts so many government bureaucrats (not workers, bureaucrats):

After years of community and economic wrong-doing by several large and small Texas’ cities, legislators gave them a sly wink that a ‘safe haven” now exist in the Chapter 380 law for any of their past, on-going or currently contemplated sins. Under the new Chapter 380 Program, anything legal or semi-legal can be economic development.

It is such a bad law that state legislators declined to determine specifically which incentives, when offered singularly or in combination, constitute a “program … to promote state or local economic development.” 

There are no rules governing community and economic development anymore, except for civil injury or death.

Economic development is now anything a city council says that it is – Whether an incentive is requested or not, it gives a city control over all development efforts.

Government takes care of government; government grows government.

Taxpayers have raised such a ruckus over wasted tax-dollars that lawmakers had to do something to bail-out their brethren.

Therefore, 380 agreements serve to only memorialize economic development projects that cities create. It gives a city council the rights of management and control over anything that it designates as a 380 project, thereby setting aside the Constitutional rights of private property ownership.

If government can control it, it – or their friends or supporters or the bureaucrat administrators – can reap the rewards while you pay the taxes, which government also puts into its pockets.

IF someone can control and manage your property, in ways that they determine, what good is your ownership of it?

Logic is not a government strong point.

The Chapter 380 law requires that a “claw-back” or “recapture” provision be in every 380-agreement. It’s a way for cities to claim that taxpayers can get the total cost of incentives and grant or loan money back – IF their economic development partner does not meet or deliver on the agreed performance.

Cities and economic development corporations now have an excuse: A guarantee that no incentive will be wasted – as every and all are recoverable.

Whoopee!

The cockroach in the coffee is that cities have always been free to have “claw back” provisions from failed goals set forth under agreement terms. Its why we’ve had agreements and contracts since 1215 (the Magna Carta signing). But moving on:

The problem for taxpayers – who pay for all incentives – is that under Section 380.001(b), the governing body may: (1) administer a 380 program by the use of municipal personnel; (2) contract with the federal government, the state, a political subdivision of the state, a nonprofit organization, or any other entity for the administration of a program.

That is a cronyism loophole large enough for the 138,600,000 supporters of the current administration to do the Boot Scootin’ Boogie in . . . (That’s the 42% that polls are reporting of the nation’s 330-million population, if you’re wondering.) Recently, over a cup of coffee, one of our Paris Chamber’s supporters said he was “missing the cheap gas prices and mean tweets.”

Chapter 380 is to protect government, while taking care of government’s friends and insiders.

It certainly is not about achieving results, as not all projects are “economic development programs.”

An improvement or a restoration of a building, allowing new instant slums in a neighborhood, some guy cleaning up junk in his yard, some crew selling “pot” on the streets, some gal painting her navel at the Culbertson Fountain, anything that can be claimed to have a potential for “community development” or to improve Paris’ appearance, can now become “economic” in the eyes of the city or when used by the PEDC (when they want it to be).

A 380 designation gives the city total administrative control and management of an entire project – which are the basic rights of private property ownership. And don’t be fooled: Control and management far exceeds the government right of ‘reasonable’ regulation.

Paris is now trying to treat community development as a need for a Chapter 380 economic development agreement; even if no loan or grant or incentive has been made by the city.

Forget any understanding of what, why, and how a project should be done.